First impression: works fine! So iPod delivers me an approximation of the instant km-pace as well as the total distance ran. It needs calibration, however, since I’m not running with Nikes. I suspect my 5K exercise today went at slower than the 4.04/km speed iPod told me. It felt all too easy to run somewhere between 3.35 and 3.55 km-pace according to iPod. On the other hand, when I tried to run really fast, I couldn’t go faster than 3.08/km… we’ll see.
Category: Tech
PhD in Catalan!

My PhD has been translated into Catalan! This is one more example of how a single decision to distribute your work with liberal terms on the Internet results in unforeseeable new opportunities. They cover me in between Stallman and Lessig. Sweet Jesus! And I bet Dr. Thompson would agree…
Kevin Kelly’s back!
I’ve always had a place in my mind for this guy. Here’s his latest piece: Scan this book! Kelly claims that the days of the printed book are over and done. We’re entering the era of universal library and snippet online-reading. Well, nothing new so far.
One of his more interesting claims is that 75% of all books in libraries are orphan – that is, out-of-print, under copyright, without clear understanding of who owns the scanning rights. But he doesn’t see that to be a major problem because the “copy” is dying. Forget copyright, Kelly says, because scanning is so easy and cheap. If it’s not Google, it will be the Chinese. In Kelly’s world, the almighty technology will always prevail.
Where Kelly shines is his compelling and clear argumentation. He is an excellent writer. However, his weak side is the prophetic, always-optimistic tone. With some practical experience, I do have reservations regarding the death of copyright and the “conservative” industries behind it. If the dot-come boom busted, contrary to Kelly’s visions, why would this time be different?
Go for a copy
It seems I’m gonna be back on TV. The topic is not that surprising: p2p and copyright. The good news is that it’s on the national TV1 next Tuesday, at 7PM, and it’s gonna be a live debate!
Now I’ve been thinking something “new” to say.
One idea is to talk a few liners about disappearing tolerance in the society. When I was a ten-year-old kid in the 1980s our principal in the school asked us to bring in Commode 64 game tapes (copied, for sure). The school had bought a new double-deck system, which did quick and high quality cassette copying – this time for the principal’s son’s new computer. Local electronic stores that sold computers also loaned out game tapes and disks for computer buyers. For copying, of course. Another principal in the high-school was telling us proudly how his son had circumvented Lotus 1-2-3’s copy protection on a high-end PC machine. So far from being suspected, we computer kids were honored as being technologically on the edge, much smarter than our parents.
Now all of this is being turned upside down: we are being told that copying is crime and leads to heavy fines and criminal punishment. We have just degenerated to dumb pirates and the suit guy is again the vice guy. Share a copy, hack a system, and the rest of your life will be ruined. My puzzle right now is, if I am just some sort of techno-hippie that happened to live like the previous generation did in the 1960s? Smoked their stuff and did their acid tests, legally, or at least without much interference, whenever they felt like it. Until the jerks in the suits noticed, and everything cool and advanced was quickly regulated as unwanted behavior. First we had war on drugs and now it’s all about war on piracy… Yes, I don’t even need to mention the real word they want to associate all this into: terror.
Stan’s lone war
Stan Liebowitz is one of those economists against filesharing. He’s just published an entertaining paper where he claims that “All technologies that break the linkage between usage and payment are parasitic”. His main example is, of course, filesharing. So payment is productive but destroying the possibility of direct payment is parasitic, non-creative and unproductive? One more quote: “without property rights, civilization would come to an end.” Ok, I give up. He’s a politician these days, not an economist. EFFI should send him this shirt.