Microsoft talks open source

It used to be that Microsoft and open source did not fit in the same sentence. Or they were the opposites.

I’m posting this from a Microsoft sponsored open source event. One Microsoft manager just said that positive feedback is what they need. They want positive feedback from open source developers. They want to change their image. They have open source partnerships and interoperability programs running.

Why the change? Larry Augustin provided an interesting thought. In the 1980s the safe bet was IBM. Nobody got fired for buying IBM. In the 1990s it was Microsoft. Nobody got fired for buying Microsoft. And now the safe bet is open source. Nobody gets fired for buying open source. And according to Augustin, Microsoft would like to still claim the same…

Car upgrade

Changed car yesterday. First sold the 1999 Toyota Avensis 1.6 sedan with 168 000 kms and no options but A/C. Piece of uninteresting and cheap junk. Bought a 2002 Ford Mondeo wagon 2.5 V6 with 130 000 kms, automatic transmission, leather seats, and other relevant options. Feels like I have a sort of car again.

Biznes

Here’s a list of startup-things I’m pretty much involved in at the moment, in no particular order:

  • Open Source License Checker — something started already years ago at our university, now we are trying to turn it into a company
  • DJ Online — a patented online music distribution system, which is a complete product used already by tens of bars and restaurants, and now needs just sales, sales and sales!
  • “Grill Barbeque” — a project without a real name; we try to launch a new fast-food chain

There are also some other ongoing things that could turn into a start-up or me joining them in the near future.

Little Brother

The flu returned for another two days. So I had time to read something, and I did Cory Doctorow’s Little Brother (a hard copy via Amazon).

Quick review: I liked the overall scenery a lot, but I’m biased. San Francisco and all the relevant organizations from local newspaper publishers to EFF and the Swedish Pirate Party are familiar enough to me to be able to get in to the mood of his characters. I also liked the basic idea of figuring out what Patriot Act combined with a crazy government could mean in the extreme.

What I did not like was how unrealistic the story was, after all. One-dimensional security guys patrolling in the streets of SF and picking everyone from their homes who connect to some encrypted Xbox network. Teenagers running the whole show. Give me a break. It was all too present-day stuff, like a year or two from now. Also, while I’m definitely not an expert in writing good prose I’ve read much better flowing stuff than this. For some reason this book felt like not completely polished, a bit like a long blog post (occasional edit typos, sudden story-stopping wikipedia-level briefings on tech terms). I can pretty much side with those who have noted Doctorow is just reusing his blogs and personal preaching.

It’s always good to read topical books like this. However, maybe because of all these issues in the “implementation”, the main point of the book, that we should watch the watchers, did not sink in that effectively. Actually I’d say Doctorow’s first novel Down and Out in the Magic Kingdom was more enjoyable to read and will probably be his best novel ever. And in my opinion, his best work with a message is Content. It’s not a novel but a collection of columns and opt-eds.

Demonstration

hesari_lexnokia

Spent the afternoon in a demonstration against Lex Nokia or snooping law. Our mighty statement got to the front page of Helsingin Sanomat as pictured above. Pretty good for another bystander. It’s Herkko on the left, Vili in the middle, and me on the right.


* * *

About the actual question: it seems to me that we have a trend towards increasing corporate privacy in the name of “business secrets” or “confidential information”. This law proposal essentially says that corporate privacy beats individual privacy. There is a sort of legal problem since corporate privacy is not a constitutional right while individual privacy is… Or used to be. We have also been witnessing the erosion of individual privacy in the face of all kind of unwanted behavior (to some corporate interests). Think file sharing as one recent example.